|
|
Post by Dmitry Molchanov on May 29, 2016 0:27:28 GMT
Greetings peeps. It has come to my attention that there have literally only been 4 members online in the last 24 hours as of May 28th, 6:19 GMT +6. So, the time has come to vote on the RP dying or pressing on. I will remain on this sinking ship as long as I can (don't deny it. This ship was full of holes from the moment we began), but it's obvious now that the ship is nearly below water, and is sinking in the same fashion as the titanic. We've hit the iceberg, and now we are finally taking on all the water. So, do we put a bullet in its engine and blow the damn thing up? Or do we let it silently sit at the bottom of the Dead-RP-Ocean? The Warzone Please make the vote thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Baako Ahmed on May 29, 2016 1:00:51 GMT
This roleplay seems to be stagnating, as David Van Rotterdam said, but I will stay, even if this ship sinks into the RP graveyard. |
|
|
|
Post by Edmund Wilson on May 29, 2016 1:44:23 GMT
I'll be honest, the premise of the RP is a good one. Sadly, the mechanics behind it were never in place to facilitate that premise. We can all do our negotiating behind closed doors for the politics, but what could we do for the nitty-gritty wars and espionage that are conducted? I will also be remaining, but I will state here and now that this RP should never have started in the state I found it in when I joined. It was unprepared for the dynamics that we are playing with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baako Ahmed on May 29, 2016 1:52:59 GMT
I'll be honest, the premise of the RP is a good one. Sadly, the mechanics behind it were never in place to facilitate that premise. We can all do our negotiating behind closed doors for the politics, but what could we do for the nitty-gritty wars and espionage that are conducted? It was unprepared for the dynamics t hat we are playing with.Yes, true Edmund Wilson . Seems like the cycle will continue. Also I'll just leave this here for the people who have left:  |
|
|
|
Post by Edmund Wilson on May 29, 2016 9:49:08 GMT
Wonderful choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Warzone on May 29, 2016 12:32:33 GMT
I think we should restructure the entire RP from the beginning to fix the problems and then start everything from the beginning.
Like make the mechanics, rules and all that stuff before we continue with the progress of the RP.
Also the Online List can be very deceptive and deducing Activity Status from it is not a wise choice. O_O I say this from experience.
Also, as long as one person stays the RP will still go somewhere. With four people on board we can still make a good RP. But that will only happen if everyone contributes full to the cause.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baako Ahmed on May 29, 2016 13:35:50 GMT
I think we should restructure the entire RP from the beginning to fix the problems and then start everything from the beginning. Like make the mechanics, rules and all that stuff before we continue with the progress of the RP. Also the Online List can be very deceptive and deducing Activity Status from it is not a wise choice. O_O I say this from experience. Also, as long as one person stays the RP will still go somewhere. With four people on board we can still make a good RP. But that will only happen if everyone contributes full to the cause. I will contribute... FOR THE CAUSE! |
|
|
|
Post by The Warzone on May 29, 2016 14:59:58 GMT
Greetings peeps. It has come to my attention that there have literally only been 4 members online in the last 24 hours as of May 28th, 6:19 GMT +6. So, the time has come to vote on the RP dying or pressing on. I will remain on this sinking ship as long as I can (don't deny it. This ship was full of holes from the moment we began), but it's obvious now that the ship is nearly below water, and is sinking in the same fashion as the titanic. We've hit the iceberg, and now we are finally taking on all the water. So, do we put a bullet in its engine and blow the damn thing up? Or do we let it silently sit at the bottom of the Dead-RP-Ocean? The Warzone Please make the vote thing. I'll be honest, the premise of the RP is a good one. Sadly, the mechanics behind it were never in place to facilitate that premise. We can all do our negotiating behind closed doors for the politics, but what could we do for the nitty-gritty wars and espionage that are conducted? I will also be remaining, but I will state here and now that this RP should never have started in the state I found it in when I joined. It was unprepared for the dynamics that we are playing with. So are you two willing to contribute in the restructuring of the Roleplay ? |
|
|
|
Post by Edmund Wilson on May 29, 2016 15:51:19 GMT
Of course I am, sir.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dmitry Molchanov on May 29, 2016 17:51:40 GMT
I am most certainly willing to reconstruct the RP from scratch. Including the battle system. While good for deducing closer engagements, it doesn't deduce certain factors like skill, what the formations are dedicated against, or other branches of the military. We have a lot to do, but it'll be worth it once we make a truly viable roleplay.  |
|
|
|
Post by Baako Ahmed on May 30, 2016 3:26:29 GMT
Mind making another thread for planning?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aldus Von Gikkengen on May 31, 2016 2:34:04 GMT
I would be willing to help in any way I can.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edmund Wilson on May 31, 2016 2:46:22 GMT
Glad to have you on board, sir.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jürgen Adler on May 31, 2016 8:43:52 GMT
While I have not been on the site for a while (And I do highly apologize for that), I am still very much interested in either keeping this roleplay going and thus restructuring it, or if the situation calls for it, much like our esteemed Dmitry Molchanov suggests, putting the bullet to the engine and starting anew. |
|
