|
Post by David Van Rotterdam on Dec 30, 2015 19:01:21 GMT
Xingmin Wu & Ramon Cañarte ValverdeIron Brothers (Ivory Coast & Ghana) outcome: The SAP and the NAU won against the GLA. Both countries will be divided into: north half goes to the NAU. the south half (coast) goes to SAP. As dictated in the Time Line. Those small eastern island in Oceania gain semi membership to the ECA. just like the Neutral States of Europe. there is a MEC island, just east from Somalia. I think that should be Neutral -------------------- For everybody: the former neutral states of Europe: heavy unrest and small raids. to blame: VCCP, the Voronov Communistic Cossack Party (the Old Guard) combine with former neutral Ukraine, Balkan Federation and Turkey: heavy unrests. many protests and eventually several civil wars. The VCCP is trying to behold their countries. by force and glorious communism. their goal: overthrow the current Russian Leaders. Also, gain more ground, power, and countries. main targets: CSTO states. former neutral Europe States, and perhaps they are going to push to the Middle East. but that's just my idea. -------------------- In case more people didn't read the Time Line correctly: there are also upcoming events in the Middle East, and Middle America (SAP & NAU I think?) for the rest: read the damn time line.
|
|
|
Post by Adam Camo Brown on Dec 30, 2015 19:42:10 GMT
Since we use the term NAU as opposed to the USA, Mexico and Canada should be dark blue.
|
|
|
Post by David Van Rotterdam on Dec 30, 2015 23:11:50 GMT
Disagreed.
The NAU is an organisation, with the USA on top of it. The USA leads that Union pact, as a counter for the rapidly growing ECA (Lorewise). That's why the ECA only has it's core within the former EU and European countries and not countries like the neutral states of Europe or the earlier token North Africake. Second, China has the same with it's GAPA group. Also on the Lore based, yet a different color. Even the Russian Federation has it. it's client states, the CSTO are different colored then Russia itself. As a forth: Faction Leaders column -> USA and not the NAU.
USA searched partners to gain some better economy after Europe and Asia rapidly grows with their own economy. That's also why, Lore, the USA has less updated Navy units. Because of this, the GLA could actually buy some of these.
as a last thing: check up with the Time Line. Mexico and Canada dislike the draft and the religious shenanigans from the former president, John Miller. They are still within the NAU nevertheless, but hey. They have their own opinion. Under the protection of Uncle Sam.
Read the damn time line people. And please reply on it if you dislike or question certain things. Bottom line is, I based it on your requests.
IMO, leave that as it is. I don't see the problem.
|
|
|
Post by Xingmin Wu on Dec 31, 2015 3:24:28 GMT
The timeline is huge, I don't recall everything on it. Changes: - SAP and USA split Ivory Coast and Ghana - Even more small insignificant islands join ECA semi-membership for some reason - That one MEC island is colored white now i.imgur.com/nsow9Wk.png
|
|
|
Post by Steven Freephoenix on Jan 1, 2016 1:01:58 GMT
Ivory Coast Is now Both Souther american and american....The half of the coast belongs to the SAP and the rest is NAU Gabon was lost to the GLA as well... Madagaskar is split in two, south being NAU and north being GLA.... Rhodes island is unallaigned now. Extra points: vatican and Mecca have small lil dot of blue
|
|
|
Post by Xingmin Wu on Jan 1, 2016 16:14:34 GMT
I thought nag said he took over Madagascar completely?
Also what's this deal with Rhode Island? o_0
|
|
|
Post by Steven Freephoenix on Jan 1, 2016 22:55:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Xingmin Wu on Jan 2, 2016 2:57:57 GMT
OOoooooh! Rhodes! LOL okay I'll fix that
|
|
|
Post by The Warzone on Jan 3, 2016 16:12:28 GMT
Will this be the last update of the map before the timeskip, i.e; Round 2 RP ?
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Brown on Jan 6, 2016 3:23:22 GMT
Tunisia is now influenced by the NAU.
|
|
|
Post by David Van Rotterdam on Jan 6, 2016 10:21:48 GMT
specify where and why Tunisia is influenced.
Last time I recall, we got still a base over there, and the GLA has the rest/entire country under control.
winning a questionable spec ops on a refinery, that wasn't suppose to be a real thing in the first place due to we don't have any ECA refineries in that mainland, doesn't give you control over a country, let alone a decent region.
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Brown on Jan 7, 2016 1:03:58 GMT
Well the GLA sure as hell doesn't control Tunisia, considering we are preparing to setup a new base there. If you want, just set it as neutral.
|
|
|
Post by Omar Al-Ghazi on Jan 7, 2016 1:09:14 GMT
Yeah, in the middle of enemy territory. How are you guys going to ship anything there from home without the GLA immediately knowing that something is up? You guys basically helped the Liquidators do their job by purging a mining refinery in the area.
|
|
|
Post by David Van Rotterdam on Jan 7, 2016 1:48:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Xingmin Wu on Jan 7, 2016 2:56:29 GMT
The Tunisian Government is a puppet under the GLA. Just because you control one base there, doesn't necessarily mean the entire country is yours, or becomes neutral.
|
|