|
|
Post by Dmitry Molchanov on Jan 27, 2017 18:55:13 GMT
www.modernnations.com/index/Behold, probably the most detailed modern nation roleplay that I've had the pleasure of coming across. Granted, its year is currently 2009, but each week is a month, so it balances out. Nevertheless, take a look at what we've got: - Everyone roleplays as a sovereign nation, no members of nations or something like that.
- An economy system that I've yet to take a look at myself, but interesting nonetheless.
- More realistic in its approach.
- LOTS of members.
This is what the Warzone imo should be, but instead, we're stuck with a very limited amount of members, broken/unfinished systems, and childish complaints from all sides. Personally, if the Warzone fails, I'll join this one...a shame that all the good nations are gone, but...ehh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alejandro Silva on Jan 27, 2017 21:32:53 GMT
www.modernnations.com/index/Behold, probably the most detailed modern nation roleplay that I've had the pleasure of coming across. Granted, its year is currently 2009, but each week is a month, so it balances out. Nevertheless, take a look at what we've got: - Everyone roleplays as a sovereign nation, no members of nations or something like that.
- An economy system that I've yet to take a look at myself, but interesting nonetheless.
- More realistic in its approach.
- LOTS of members.
This is what the Warzone imo should be, but instead, we're stuck with a very limited amount of members, broken/unfinished systems, and childish complaints from all sides. Personally, if the Warzone fails, I'll join this one...a shame that all the good nations are gone, but...ehh. Hey If your happy with all of the "realisim" then I'd be happy to see you go try it.This roleplays based off a videogame with arcadey mecahnics that make infantry viable because tanks only fire AP rounds at the soldiers feet.Not saying thats what it is now, but thats where it comes from. If it makes you happy and its what your looking for then go give it a shot! But I dont think that would be the cup of tea of most people here. |
|
|
|
Post by Dmitry Molchanov on Jan 27, 2017 22:03:03 GMT
XD Infantry are viable IRL Bruce. Nice try. But tanks are just as viable against infantry as they are against other vehicles. Hence HE rounds. And of course it wouldn't be Bruce. Just letting people know that there's another alternative for when the Warzone inevitably collapses in and itself like it did in previous rounds.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alejandro Silva on Jan 27, 2017 22:18:12 GMT
XD Infantry are viable IRL Bruce. Nice try. But tanks are just as viable against infantry as they are against other vehicles. Hence HE rounds. And of course it wouldn't be Bruce. Just letting people know that there's another alternative for when the Warzone inevitably collapses in and itself like it did in previous rounds. I never said they arent IRL, Im just saying what the foundation of all this is a videogame with videogame logic put into it. To translate this Into "IRL" things would make alot of weapons and mecahnics invalid or just absurd/inefficent. Well the Warzone collapsed mostly of disagreement of battle or how things will play out or because of scale.I remember In one Round Cell made all of asia his own little island retreat, with austrailia and new zeland too If I remember correctly. Realisim was never a factor, only issue was "Would X win vs Y" and I understand you guys would want to use real life logic to determine if Y or X is better. |
|
